I made a MatCap based on the default shading.
The goal was to create a MatCap that feels familiar but does not look overexposed and does not have those weird lines.
Remember that MatCaps are used for hard-surface modeling too – think cars, sci-fi shapes, or generally any sub-d mesh with smooth, flowing, curves/bevels.
For those we need more metallic matcaps, ones that show how reflections flow along the surface. I haven’t had much success myself when trying to replace the gold, silver, and shiny red matcaps we have today that I typically use.
Anyone care to attempt to help with those types? A matcap with straight lines on it (like zebra stripes) would also aide in this type of workflow too: https://developer.blender.org/T52087
Psych, im back. This time I have a Ceramic like matcap. I know its not flashy, or cool. But I honestly believe it will be useful. I mean, its easy on the eyes, shows form well, and just looks nice.
-Matcap creator (I know other people have created similar blend files, but mine automagically composites a background as well, while still allowing an hdri map, etc. ) here (google drive)
Don’t want to get this thread off topic ,but since we can now add our own matcaps ,it would be nice to filter them. @Wazou kinda gave me the idea when he posted the different types of matcaps. What if we could add different folders in the main matcap folder(Plastic, Metallic, Clay, etc.) and then filter based on the folders?
Readability should be key, dear fellow blender artists!
Please a bit less: “Wow, my ball looks so cool!”
…and more of: “Wow, the mesh is so readable!”
As a fair punishment everybody should have to use the matcaps they voted for.
You’ll then know why #30, #41, #61, #86… etc are so good! (They’re no punishment obviously.)
I’m not talking about default ones. I’m talking about when you start adding your own and your way beyond the 16-24. You would then have to search a while for a specific “type” of matcaps . You might have a “clay” matcap on the first column and then one at the bottom(say column 30). A way to group(ordering, filtering, etc.) them into categories would then come in handy.
Honest question, and a call for your opinion. What do you think of how I’m approaching matcap design currently, in your opinion am I creating useful quality matcaps that you would use? If not I really don’t want to continue with the process I have now, I do want to contribute to the 2.8 project.