The next meeting will be on Tuesday January 24, 15:00-16 CEST (Your local time: 2023-01-24T14:00:00Z), which is 2 weeks from this meeting. The provisional meeting agenda will be linked in the #geometry-nodes channel before the meeting.
Miter joints will be a godsend for arc-viz, carpentry… <3
Out of these two I would prefer “Constant Thickness” but given the similar functionality in the Solidify modifier, would “Even Thickness” be more familiar and consistent?
Custom node builders tend to name their Extrude Mesh versions “Solidify Even” as well. People use the word “(un)even” when talking about the current Curve to Mesh behaviour on StackExchange and on BA. Inset operator also has the “Offset Even” option…
In case I missed something,
There is a “Simulations” branch of Blender already available right now. As far as I am aware it only introduces Simulation In/out nodes, which, basically, store the previous frame’s data.
Why could not it land in master branch without any other nodes necessary for proper simulations?
I think, having those two new nodes will make a huge deal of a new feature in 3.5.
Could you please shed more light on decision making on postponing simulations for later versions of Blender?
The cache system couldn’t get ready on time. That and some unforeseen refactor work lead the team to post-pone it. This way we can focus on the other tasks for 3.5, as oppose to have nothing new there.
@BlenderBruno
Hello Bruno any everybody,
I’m very SORRY but I couldn’t contact you in any other way about your osx build from this thread:
Yes, if you could re-share it it would be fantastic. I apologize for late answer but ‘reply’ button disappeared after my last reply and it seems that there is no way I can send you direct message.
Thank you and sorry for posting in this thread but I thought it would be more rude first to ask you and then not answer at all.