Expandable Geometry Socket [Proposal]

[Quijx]

Good to have prototypes of both approaches now to compare them fairly.
I did a comparison of both on the case of a delaunay triangulation node over on the fields topic.
Just though I would link it here too.

Fields and Anonymous Attributes [Proposal]

Here my two cents on the whole “Fields” vs “Expandable Geometry Sockets” debate and feedback on the prototypes: Even before the prototypes, I liked the Fields approach better, mostly because I found it much easier to build a mental model of the whole concept, making it easier to predict how nodes will behave, especially in edge cases. Also the fields approach seems to encourage abstraction more, making it easier to reuse node groups in different situations. As a test, I recreated a delaunay tr…