Finally took a moment to check out the updated proposal in more detail. Generally something I can get behind. Just two points of feedback:
-
Referring to non-active modules:
For critical issues (like crashes), the core developers can take a look, if the issue is considered severe by the admins
Does that mean admins are responsible for finding severe issues in non-active (“red”) modules? That seems like quite a burden loaded onto them. I’d say the triaging team can just do this, if in doubt core developers or admins can help out with their judgement.
-
As example for the channel header, you use
#geometry-nodesas an example. I think that’s okay to demonstrate the point, but I’d note that this in fact is not a module channel, but a project channel. We should always be very explicit about this difference (especially since a project may involve multiple modules). By the way, as naming convention I’d propose using-moduleand-projectsuffixes respectively.